Biking in Kanata series: maps

Here are a few section of biking maps depicting North Kanata

OldKanatBikeMap
From MapArt Ontario paper map published in 1999

This map is pretty decent given that very large part of the Kanata we know today did not exist at the time of printing. There are parts of the bike infrastructure missing even though they existed long before the map was made. For example, a path through Beaverbrook Park connecting Parkway and Campeau adjacent to Oakes Wood is missing.

MapGuideLiteView
This is a section of on-line City of Ottawa on-line map published in 2006

The online version of this map is difficult to navigate. There is an “emap” version, but it requires an install. I don’t remember if I ever installed it, but if I did I don’t remember being impressed. Again, despite Beaverbrook now changing for at least a decade if not four, this map shows different paths than the above one. The path between Parkway and Campeau is present (yay!) but the paths on Leacock and Parkway surrounding Alice Woods (name not on the map) are incorrectly drawn. Also, the paths next to the Stephen Leacock elementary school are missing as are others, notably the link between Beaverbrook and Kanata Lakes (Leacock to Knudson by Tiffany Crescent). This map, besides being on-line and free, is definitely inferior to the printed version.

KanataBikePlanMap
Map from the Ottawa Cycling Plan document published in 2008

As is expected from a decent planning document, this has all the paths I can think of, even the little paths surrounding public buildings like the library, high school and daycare. An interesting omission on this map is the link between Beaverbrook and Kanata Lakes present on the on-line city map. I believe this link is owned by the City but the golf course people paint “Private” on it every year and every year it gets painted over in black paint (by the City or a citizen, I don’t know). Another thing noticeable about this map is that it has Castlefrank south of the highway marked as a “shared route” which I have never heard of before but I suppose it means that the road is extra vide to allow for cyclists, even though there are no painted lanes. I like this because Castlefrank is a good connection to get to Hazeldean from the highway overpass.

In any case, this map is the most complete map despite not being intended for “tourist” use.

2011KanataMap
Recently published (privately?) Capital region cycling map. It is not advertised from the city website, but there is City logo on the map itself as well as NCC, Gatineau and Bixi logos

I like the look and feel of this map even though it sacrifices street names of all but the major thoroughfares for the tidy look. I love the suggested routes in dotted red. In content, this map has more paths than the 2006 on-line map, but also carries mistakes present in that version (messed up path north of Parkway). There are also discrepancies with the planning document map, notably in the Village Green (south of Campeau) area, though they might be due to area being built up since 2008. Minor paths, such as ones leading to the library, high school and daycare are missing, but that might be by choice. It is interesting that the section of Castlefrank, marked on the City planning map as shared use, is not marked on this map at all, not even as a suggested route even though this would be my choice trajectory to get to Hazeldean.

Overall, this map is a definite improvement over the 2006 version but I wish that they had used the city planning map rather than whatever they used to determine where the paths are. Suggested routes are a step in the right direction, but you have keep in mind that they are someone else’s choice and might not reflect your own preferences.

google_map_beaverbrook
Screen capture of Google Maps with cycling directions

Then there is the Google, because, frankly, that is the map that I, if not most people, am most likely to use. It is in Beta version which explains the bizarre choices of which paths are marked. There are at least a couple of paths noted here that are not in any other maps. These paths exist in real life but I am guessing they are too recent for the other maps. I’ve submitted a request to add the path next to Beaverbrook Park to the map so I am waiting to see if there will be any reply. I suspect that this map will be much better once it is out of Beta. Until then, meh!

Biking in Kanata series: kids as cargo

CIMG7118

A bike with kid carrying capabilities in Kanata is, in my opinion, not a one less minivan. I see a lot of trailers and third wheels, even tandem third wheels are not unusual, on Kanata roads and paths. If you walk down any residential street on a weekend, you will see open garages with fleets of bicycles inside. Around elementary and high school bike racks are always filled during school hours. It is a common sight for elementary school kids to bike (usually on sidewalks) unaccompanied by adults.

On the other hand, I have never seen a cargo bike in Kanata. I have only seen one cargo bike in Ottawa that was obviously intended for child transport. I saw it on Bank street next to Lansdowne. As a Kanata family that tries to bike as much as possible, I choose to run most of my errands by car. While it is not impossible for a Kanata family (parents with children) to cut down to one car and a fleet of bicycles, including utilitarian bicycles such as cargo bikes, I have this preconception that it would take significant sacrifices in terms of convenience and comfort. I wonder if anyone has done it and what their experience was. Frankly, I could not stand living in Kanata without my own dedicated car even before we had children, though many of my dinky friends seem to do well with sharing a single car between a couple.

Note, in this post I refer to cargo bikes as bikes with a box to carry children and groceries in. I have actually seen about half a dozen of the other kind of child cargo bike (the bike with extended back rack) this weekend on the night ride. Most of the ones I have noticed seemed to be sold at Tall Tree Cycles (though Kunstadt employee assured me that they sell Xtracycle parts). These include Kona Ute and Surly Big Dummy as well as regular bikes with Xtracycle attachment. I’ve spoken to the lady riding the Kona Ute and she was very happy with it. She lives in Ottawa neighbourhood closeish to downtown and carries a 5 and a 7 year old on the back. I did not ask her if having a child carrying bike allows her to get rid of the second family car though her neighbourhood, being somewhat older, is probably a lot less car centric than Kanata.

On re-reading this post I noticed that I have completely dismissed trailers and third wheels as utilitarian child transport, even though they are adequate for the task. In fact, the other kid in Trev’s daycare that gets biked to school arrives by trailer and, more recently, by a tandem third wheel. However, same as Trevor, he is mostly dropped off by car. We own and use a trailer, and it is not unlikely that we will get a third wheel at some point. These are fantastic products but are optimal for long distance and recreational riding. Trailers are really difficult to back up, a hassle to lock to a bike rack and require fair amount of athletic riding to pull. Any time I biked to work with the trailer I needed a shower. In my experience a trailer is not a good solution for utilitarian trips under 10km.

Edit: Yes, I know of a number of Kanata families, including families with up to three children, that only have one car. However, I do not know any family that handles the lack of second car by the whole, or most, of the family cycling.

Biking in Kanata series: biking to work

Over the decade I have been living in Kanata, I have biked to work at least several times each summer. In fact, biking to work is the single most “successful” aspect of my utilitarian Kanata biking, possibly the only consistent utilitarian biking. I have biked on three different bicycles, from three different homes (two in Beaverbrook, one in Morgan’s Grant) to two different work locations (the main building and the factory) over four significantly different paths. I have also biked to Carleton from Beaverbrook for two seasons. Here are some thoughts:

Weather:
I am a fair weather cyclist. I don’t bike if it is too hot or too cold.

Routes:
The fastest routes tend to be the ones with most car traffic and most lacking in helpful bicycle infrastructure. Existence of a bike lane on the road does not make a route appropriate for all cyclists. When I started cycling in Kanata and now that I carry children on the bike, I do not go on the March road for more than one block. I will bike on March road when I am alone, but the disappearing bike lanes at intersections, “bike pockets” and trucks zipping past at 80km/h creep me out. March road is definitely not a family route.

Alternative to the March road is a multi use path (MUP) through the forest. It is longer and slower but much more pleasant. There are a good number of commuters on the path which makes it even more pleasant. However, the path is currently closed as a part of the forest is being cut down to build houses. The city or the builder very kindly did not make alternate arrangements for people to get through. Apparently a good number of commuters still use this path despite fence and no trespassing signs. If I am going to trespass, I’d rather do it on flat and paved so I am currently using a section of private road parallel to March road to get to work.

Showers:
Showers take time and require extra luggage (towel, shampoo, flip-flops, hairbrush) on the bike. When I was booting it to Carleton (20+ km), taking a nice refreshing shower was great. As no one was paying me for my time, it was not an issue, however, taking shower at work, particularly after only 8km biked, was a hassle and a waste of time. Ideally, if I am biking less than 10km, which is the case with my work, I would prefer to be able to bike leisurely without requiring any clothes change whatsoever, not even shoes if I can help it.

The future:
I see myself continuing to bike to work on most summer days, given the weather is not too crazy. This will be more likely once all the kids are in school/daycare in Beaverbrook three years from now. I will also have to do something about the speed of my commuter bike in order to keep my leisurely trip within 10 minutes or less it would take me with the car. I can’t justify more than 20 minutes per day of extra commuting time.

The infrastructure:
March road is fine for aggressive and experienced cyclists. I would feel more comfortable if the bike lane did not disappear when you needed it most, but I am not holding my breath for this to change. I would like to see a MUP parallel to the road, there is plenty of space on the south side of the street. I don’t know when the forest path will be open again and in what shape it will be, given the housing development, but in the absence of a MUP next to the March road, it is not a bad alternative.

May, the bike to work month

IMG_1918

I managed to bike to work three times this spring. Considering the torrential downpours, humidex warnings, tendency to get up too late and the week of stomach flu, this is pretty good.

It takes me about 45 min to drop the kids off and get to work. This is about 15 to 20 minutes longer than if I was driving, so I don’t see myself biking every day. I can’t spare 40 minutes daily, though three out of the five days would be a really nice average.

I attended a meeting about sustainable suburbs and making Kanata more wakeable/bikeable. It is a concept very dear to my heart, but there is a lot about the subject that I don’t really understand, even when it comes to my own habits. I think I will examine my transport choices to see what causes me to walk, bike or take the car.

Daycare

Moms love to fuss and make a big deal out of nothing. Daycare is one of those things.

Right off the start, I hate the concept of kindergarden. I am sure it was a great idea in the stone age where most moms stayed at home and dropping their kids off for three hours in the middle off the day was handy thing to do. Today, with only 30% of stay-at-home rate, it is not very helpful for the other 70% of parents. The option is now to either keep the kids in daycare centres (which have kindergarten programs) and skipping the public school until grade 1 or to find a home daycare within bussing distance of the school and have the daycare provider walk your kid to school or a bus stop.

Ironically enough I will be at home during next year because I will be on mat leave. Theoretically I will be able to walk Trev to his three hours of kindergarden and keep him home for the rest of the day. As this is essentially free, financially wise, it is the best choice. However, he is a picky eater at home but eats everything at the daycare. Also, he is very introverted and I am not sure how healthy would it be for him to spend most of his day with an exhausted adult and a baby instead of kids his own age. Sure, I have some friends with kids his age at home, and I could make a point of taking him to city playgroups, but this is not something I can really rely on for every day of the week.

The daycare center Trev is at now is fantastic, but they only take kids between ages of 2 and 5. This means that even if I keep Trev in the center next year, I will have to find a home daycare within bussing distance for the year after. I will definitely have to find a home care for him once he starts elementary school. The home care Owen is in now is good, but it is not in the bussing range. I have a couple of names, but I am still a bit weary of switching home cares, especially after the bad experience we’ve had last time we tried to find daycare in our neighbourhood (The morning we were about to take Trev to daycare, the lady called us to tell us that she had changed her mind and will not take him). Because I will not be requiring home daycare for another year, it is too early to start interviewing people and while finding after school home daycare should not be a big problem, very few home daycares will take babies as they are not profitable. To muddy the water, we just got an e-mail from a daycare centre near my work saying that they have a space for Trev for next year.

So in summary:

Options for 2011/2012 school year
1. Keep all three kids at home – cheap and insane
2. Trev stays in local daycare center, Owen goes to current home daycare part time until a space opens for him in the local daycare centre, we take Trev out of the centre at the beginning of summer – pricey but doable
3. Put Trev in the other daycare centre, Owen should get in soon afterwards, under siblings rule. Keep Trev there until he is ready for elementary school – convenient but very expensive, also I would have to drive them there rather than walk or bike as it is quite far

Options for 2012/2013 school year
1. Hope I can find a good home daycare in the neighbourhood for both Trev and the baby, Owen goes to local daycare centre once he turns 2 and a half, or he already has a spot at 2 years old if Trev was there when Owen turned 2
2. Trev and Owen go to the far daycare centre, baby goes to our current home daycare until there is a spot for him with his brothers (at 18 months)
3. If I can’t find care for the baby in the neighbourhood, baby stays at far home daycare, Trev goes to local home daycare and Owen goes to local daycare centre. This will mean that I will have three different spots to drop the kids off every day.

Frankly, if I was running the world (or Ontario, anyway), I would cancel all kindergarden programs that are housed in elementary schools. If you are going to implement pre-elementary school education, than do it as a part of a full service, 9 hours per day, full lunch cooked from scrap on premisses, two hour nap and enclosed playground daycare centre that takes in kids between 1 and 6 years old. You could even have special hours where stay-at-home moms could drop their kids off for instruction free of charge. This whole patchwork care we have currently is driving me crazy.

Bike review – Kona Africa

I’ve had Kona Africa for a little bit over a year now, it is probably a good time for a review.

I’ve got this bicycle for express purpose of kid transport. Essentially, it is a compact cargo bike. I’ve had two bobike seats installed at the shop. The front seat interfered with the basket that came with the bike so it was replaced with a different (larger) basket. The rest of the bike is original.

IMG_1873

I have never used an internal hub before, but I really like it on this bike as I can shift any time, not just when I am moving. Coaster breaks are something that I had the hardest time leaving behind when I moved from riding minibikes to hybrids. I am so happy to break with my foot instead of hand again. Installed rear wheel lock is another thing that I had on my childhood bike and am excited to have again. Admittedly, on my childhood bike, the wheel lock was loose and not actually installed. The bike mechanic refused to install it because he said I was going to break my spokes, but I think he was just being lazy and giving excuses. Africa comes with the installed wheel lock, so there is no fear of lazy bike mechanics. Besides, bike mechanics at Tall Tree Cycles, where I got the bike, are very nice and not lazy at all.

IMG_1885

The bobike child seats fit well on the bike, though I had to order an extra part for the larger seat due to the non standard rear rack. The kids love riding and the bike is quite stable even with both of them on. Owen loves ringing the bell and while I think it is cute, I am not sure if that is a good thing. I suppose I can always move his hand away if we are in a situation where random bell ringing might be confusing to the rest of the traffic.

In terms of performance, this bike is the happiest when it is fully loaded. With both kids on, it rides like a charm, even going up smaller hills is a non issue. I have not tried any steep hills, and I am not sure if I would.

I do have two complaints about the bike. The first is that my thighs are too long so the horizontal distance between the seat and the pedals is uncomfortable. Interestingly enough, this is not an issue with both boys on the bike, it is a little bit of an issue with only one of them and it is a big issue when I ride alone. I don’t have a good explanation as to why. Maybe the bike stretches under weight? The second complaint is that the bike is slow. It might be possible to get it to be faster by replacing the standard heavy duty puncture proof tires with slicker ones, but I am not ready for that at this point.

The cost of the bike is at the lower end of what you would pay at a bike shop, usually a bit above $400. The child seats set me back about $300. Given that the cheapest kid carrying cargo bike for sale in Ottawa is $1500 (it was not available when I was looking two years ago though I could have gotten a different one in Toronto for $4000), I think I got decent value for my money. Plus, once the kids are too big, I still have a useable bike.